In 2025, homeowners must decide between composite decking vs wood, and contractors need a reliable partner to navigate every bid. LS Building Products supports you with objective guidance, access to premium composite and wood decking materials, and hands-on service that keeps projects moving. If you’re scoping a new build or a replacement, you can explore our full lineup of composite and wood decking materials through our decking solutions for pros.
Homeowners expect clear, defensible recommendations from you when asked to compare wood and composite decking. The right answer depends on climate, maintenance expectations, and long-term costs—especially in Central Illinois, where humidity and freeze–thaw cycles stress exterior materials. Below is a side-by-side view you can reference in client conversations.
|
Category |
Composite/PVC Decking |
Traditional Wood Decking |
|---|---|---|
|
Durability and weather resistance |
Engineered to resist moisture, rot, and insect damage; premium capped composites and PVC maintain structural integrity and appearance in wet and freeze–thaw conditions. |
Pressure-treated lumber resists rot and insects but can warp, check, and splinter; cedar/redwood offer natural oils but still weather and soften over time. |
|
Maintenance requirements |
Routine soap-and-water cleaning; no sanding, staining, or sealing. Color and texture are designed to hold up with minimal upkeep. |
Regular staining or sealing is typically needed; boards may require sanding, fastener re-setting, and periodic board replacement. |
|
Visual appeal and design flexibility |
Consistent color, grain, and board straightness; wide palette and multi-width options; hidden-fastener systems create clean, modern lines. |
Natural grain and character appeal; color varies board-to-board; finishing required to maintain appearance; visible fasteners are common. |
|
Cost considerations over time |
Higher initial investment with significantly lower maintenance costs; longer service life typically reduces life-cycle cost. |
Lower upfront cost, higher ongoing maintenance; more susceptible to early replacement in harsh exposures. |
|
Sustainability and material sourcing |
Many composites incorporate recycled materials and content; long service life and low-maintenance coatings reduce lifetime resource use. |
Renewable resource; treatments, coatings, and shorter service life can increase lifetime environmental and labor impact. |
In humid summers and freeze–thaw winters, water management and surface stability matter. Ground-level builds, poolside edges, and shaded zones challenge wood with moisture and mildew. Modern composites and PVC boards reduce these risks by limiting water absorption and eliminating annual resealing. For installs that push the envelope—like near-grade or damp settings—contractors often look to solutions like MoistureShield Meridian capped composite for wet or ground-contact applications, which helps maintain performance where wood most often struggles.
Contractors also need credible, third-party data. Independent testing from Consumer Reports’ 2024 decking tests scored Envision Distinction at 85/100, MoistureShield Vision at 82, and Zuri Premium at 80—each outperforming #2 pressure-treated pine at 61/100. The same analysis projected routine maintenance cost reductions of roughly two-thirds over the first 10 years for composites, giving you measurable talking points when homeowners ask about composite decking vs pressure-treated wood.
Looking at life-cycle sustainability and economics, the 2025 UNECE life-cycle analysis found wood-plastic composite (WPC) decking delivered 22% lower total CO₂-e emissions and a 12% lower 20-year net present cost than treated softwood, largely due to approximately double the service life and the elimination of annual coatings. These are powerful facts to share when clients want you to compare wood and composite decking on both budget and environmental impact.
If an existing deck shows advanced decay or safety issues, align recommendations with timing. Our guide to timing a deck replacement can help you set realistic expectations before presenting options.
For clients weighing MoistureShield vs Envision decking, frame the choice around site conditions and desired aesthetics: ground-contact tolerance and moisture resistance often favor MoistureShield, while Envision’s compression-molded elegance can make a statement on elevated or feature decks. Zuri enters the conversation when you want a PVC surface with the high-gloss look of fine hardwood.
Pressure-treated lumber delivers upfront savings and familiar installation, making it a go-to for budget-focused builds. It’s readily available, fast to cut and fasten, and a good match for straightforward framing and simple footprints. Cedar and redwood add natural color and tighter wood grain, often chosen for their visual warmth and workable weight.
The trade-off is weathering and maintenance. Treated pine can shrink, cup, and splinter as it dries, while cedar and redwood soften in high UV and moisture. All three typically require a regular maintenance routine that includes cleaning and periodic stain or seal to preserve color and prevent fiber breakdown. If your client prioritizes minimal upkeep and long-term appearance, this is where composites and PVC often win the composite decking vs wood discussion.
Real-world project types we support every day include:
LS Building Products serves Central Illinois contractors, including East Peoria and surrounding communities, with complete decking material support and jobsite logistics designed for Midwestern weather and schedules. If you’re aligning specifications or building a material list, our decking category hub keeps everything in one place.
Whether you’re building a budget-friendly platform or a showpiece outdoor room, the right choice in composite decking vs wood comes down to service life, maintenance, and climate readiness. LS Building Products is ready to help you evaluate site conditions, compare brands, and align materials with client expectations—so you can deliver a deck that looks great and performs for years.
Next steps for contractors and remodelers in Central Illinois:
Build with confidence—and build success together—with a supply partner that stands behind your work from takeoff to jobsite delivery.
Ready to compare options with a specialist? Connect with our team to align materials with budget, maintenance goals, and site conditions.
Generally, yes. Composites and PVC boards are engineered to minimize water absorption and surface checking, which can reduce issues tied to freeze–thaw cycles. Wood remains workable and strong, but it requires diligent sealing to combat moisture intrusion. When clients ask about composite decking vs wood for winter performance, emphasize moisture control, ventilation, and fastener choice in addition to material selection.
Most composite and PVC products call for simple cleaning during the season, without annual staining or sealing. Pressure-treated wood typically benefits from a finishing schedule (often every 1–3 years, depending on exposure and product), along with periodic sanding and board replacement over time. The simplified upkeep is a major reason contractors prefer composite decking vs real wood for busy homeowners.
Site conditions drive the answer. Some composites are specifically engineered for ground-contact or wet environments. MoistureShield is a common pick for these installs; see our overview of MoistureShield Meridian capped composite in wet or near-grade applications. Always follow the manufacturer's clearances and local codes for airflow and drainage beneath the deck surface.
Premium composites and PVC products include engineered cap layers to resist UV fade. All dark surfaces, including wood, absorb more heat in direct sun; lighter colors help mitigate temperature. For homeowners focused on minimal maintenance, color retention, and a refined finish, Zuri and Envision lines are popular options to evaluate alongside site exposure and shade patterns.
There isn’t a single answer—project scope, material costs, and homeowner priorities matter. For long-term value and low upkeep, composites and PVC generally lead. For the lowest upfront cost and familiar installation, pressure-treated wood remains attractive. When you’re asked to compare wood and composite decking on total cost of ownership and sustainability, reference Consumer Reports’ 2024 test insights and the 2025 UNECE life-cycle analysis to support your recommendation.